The opening 2 of 'majeure précisée',
balanced and with 20-21HC, replaces the classic opening of 2NT. The opening 2NT is therefore
made available. Here are its main developments:
The opening of 2NT, or 2NT multi, is quite ambiguous. It is used to indicate :
- Either as barrage to in Transfer to
a weak hand but with a solid 7-card
suiter.
- Or a strong hand, with a 6 cards major suiter, or with a 55 minor or major two-suiter.
For the sake of coherence in keeping with the 2NT barrage opening at ,
the other weak 7-card barrage openings are also covered on this
page, although they are not opened 2NT but as other transfer openings at level 3.
And at the end of the presentation, a summary of the main auctions of the strong and
regular opening 2.
With 7, opening
2SA (Transfer to
)
With 7, opening
3
(Transfer to
)
With 7, opening
3
(Transfer to
)
With 7, opening of
(Transfer to
)
Any refusal by responder to complete in the weak 7° suiter is a game forcing.
The 2NT(Transfer to )
and 3
(Transfer to
) are more constructive, with a
solid 7 cards minor suiter, in the hope of playing 3NT.
The 3 and 3NT openings are not used.
The opener opens 2NT as if he had 7. Then
after completing to 3
he makes a rebid in order
to describe his hand.:
2SA(presumed 7![]() |
3![]() |
Pass (with 7![]() |
|
3![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
3![]() ![]() |
|
3![]() ![]() |
|
3SA (with 5![]() ![]() |
|
4![]() ![]() ![]() |
* Any other response than completing
to 3, whose 3NT, is game forcing.
** On this 3, the only non-forcing responses
from responder are Pass and 4
.
*** At least 16-17HCP. With 6
5
,
and same strength, see the opening 1NT and the opener' rebid
4
.
They promise at least 13-14HCP and 7/8 tricks, but are inferior to the game-forcing opening.
They are of the 'Acol' type. They are opened by
3
(transfer to 3
), followed after completing by
3
or 3
:
3![]() ![]() |
3![]() |
Pass (with 7![]() |
|
3![]() ![]() |
|
3![]() ![]() |
* Any other response than completing
to 3, whose 3NT, is game forcing.
____________________
Opening 2 diamonds
The opening 2, balanced and with
20-21HCP, replaces the classic opening 2NT and fulfills all the functions of the latter.
But in addition it allows the following important and new details:
If the responder has a regular hand, without a 5 cards major suiter, he bids a relay response
2 or 2
which requires completing to 2NT :
2![]() |
2![]() ![]() |
2NT (completing) | Pass or 3NT |
* Mandatory completing to 2NT. Responder passes with at most 3/4HCP.
If responder has at least 5HCP, after rectification to 2NT, he bifs 3NT.
NB: The relays 2
and 2
always require completing to 2NT. The choice
of the relay is related to the responder's rebid which specifies the meaning
of it.
The only case where the choice of the relay has no importance is as here when the responder wants to
play 2NT or 3NT.
The responder bids a direct Transfer response at level 3, forcing game.
Example with 5 :
2![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
|
3NT (with 2![]() |
* Game forcing. This precise response is impossible in classical auctions because, had the
responder only has 1HCP or 2HCP, it would force the opener to
play 3 or 3NT.
Since the fit in major is known from the start by both players, this allows the responder to
name his first control straight away if he has a slam ambition, otherwise to conclude at
4
This is also perfect in classical auctions, if the pair has agreed that the
response 3 is game forcing, but the contract
3
would then be forbidden when the the
responder is weaker, for instance with 2HCP.
No problem in specified major:
He makes a relay response by naming the inverse major which requires completing
to 2NT by opener. Then, after this 2NT, he makes an indirect Transfer response.
Example with
5 and weak hand:
2![]() |
2![]() |
2NT (complete relay 2![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
Pass |
and
2![]() |
2![]() |
2NT (complete relay 2![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
Pass |
If responder has a very weak hand with a 6° minor he makes the response of 2NT, which
requires the rectification to 3.
Example with JX8542 or QX8542 at
for any soup:
2![]() |
2NT (presumed weak and 6![]() |
3![]() |
Pass |
* Mandatory rectification at 2NT. Forget playing
3 after classical opening 2NT, which would
be a Staman
With at least 5/6HCP, the opener would have bidded the direct
3 answer
And with VX8542 or DX8542 at for any soup:
2![]() |
Pass (distress) |
Forget playing 2 after classical opening 2NT,
of course. But forget also playing 3
which would
be a transfer to
.
With at least 5/6HCP, the opener would have bidded the indirect
3 answer
He bids a Stayman, but it is an indirect Stayman bid.
The opener bids first the inverse major as relay. The first answer
relay 2 then clearly indicates 4
without 4
and the answer relay 2
indicates 4
without 4
. After the relay, the opner must always
complete to 2NT :
2![]() |
2![]() |
2NT (obligatory) | 3![]() ![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
|
3NT (without 4![]() |
and
2![]() |
2![]() |
2NT (obligatory) | 3![]() ![]() |
3![]() ![]() |
|
3NT (without 4![]() |
NB : The direct responder's answer 3 is forbidden.
If reponder used this answer, when the opener has no fit in the responder' major he would have
to rebid 3
, and on
this 3
the responder would have to
bid and play himself 3NT. And if after 3
the responder bidded for instance 3
instead of 3NT,
he would indicate a 5
4
two-suiter with at least 9HCP.
contact : maubird@orange.fr